Australia GMP for Medicinal Cannabis
In Australia, medicinal cannabis is a therapeutic good regulated nationally. The Office of Drug Control (ODC) licenses who may cultivate, produce, manufacture, import and export cannabis, and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) sets the quality rules: a TGA manufacturing licence, the PIC/S Guide to GMP (PE 009-17) and the TGO 93 product standard. Growers that only cultivate, cut, dry or make a first crude extract for a TGA-licensed manufacturer are exempt from TGA licensing, but TGA expects those steps to follow GMP principles. CSQ certification for cannabis and hemp operations, with the new CSQ Pharma-GMP Addendum, is a voluntary, independent audit of those practices. It does not replace any TGA or ODC licence, permit or approval.
Australia’s Medicinal Cannabis GMP Rules and Where CSQ Certification Fits
START HERE
Does Australia Require GMP for Medicinal Cannabis?
WHO REGULATES WHAT
Two federal regulators, one national scheme
The Office of Drug Control licenses cultivation, production, manufacture, import and export under the Narcotic Drugs Act 1967. The TGA licenses manufacturing quality and sets product standards under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. A licence from one does not replace a licence from the other. States and territories give medicines scheduling legal effect and, depending on the product, may require their own prescribing approval.
THE REQUIREMENT
Mandatory, government-licensed GMP for manufacturing
Manufacturing steps need a TGA licence and must follow the PIC/S Guide to GMP (PE 009-17), and products must meet TGO 93. Growers that only cultivate, cut, dry or make a first crude extract for a licensed manufacturer are exempt from TGA licensing, but TGA expects GMP principles. No private certificate is required, and none is named.
WHERE CSQ FITS
Voluntary, independent proof, especially upstream
CSQ certification for cannabis and hemp operations, with the Pharma-GMP Addendum, gives an independent annual audit. Its clearest value is upstream, at growing and drying sites that no TGA licence covers, and as supplier assurance for the manufacturers and sponsors they supply. It does not replace any TGA or ODC licence, permit or approval.
What Australia actually requires
Australia runs one national medicinal cannabis scheme with two federal regulators. The Office of Drug Control (ODC) controls access. A single medicinal cannabis licence under the Narcotic Drugs Act 1967 (s 8E) can authorise cultivation, production and manufacture, and no activity can start until ODC also issues a permit setting the types and quantities allowed. Imports and exports need their own ODC licences and permissions. ODC says it does not regulate manufacturing standards; that is the TGA’s job.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regulates quality. Under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989, carrying out a step in manufacturing therapeutic goods without a TGA licence is an offence unless an exemption applies (s 35), and “manufacture” includes processing, packaging, labelling, storage, testing and release for supply (s 3). Every licence requires compliance with the Manufacturing Principles, which adopt the PIC/S Guide to GMP (PE 009-17) from 1 September 2025. Products must also meet TGO 93, the Therapeutic Goods (Standard for Medicinal Cannabis) (TGO 93) Order 2017, which sets identity, contaminant, assay, labelling, packaging and microbial requirements, and the GMP rules for steps carried out overseas. TGO 93 is scheduled to sunset on 1 April 2027, and TGA has outlined a staged program of reform; no replacement has been registered yet.
There is one important carve-out. Plant material and crude oils whose only therapeutic use is as a starting material for a licensed manufacturer are exempt from TGA licensing (Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990, Schedule 7 item 2). TGA says this lets cultivation sites “grow, cut and dry cannabis plant material, or perform the first crude extraction step” without a GMP approval when the material goes on to a GMP-licensed site. TGA still expects those steps to be run with GMP principles in mind, and the plant must still meet TGO 93’s contaminant limits. ODC licenses those sites, but it does not regulate manufacturing standards.
So in Australia, GMP for manufacturing is mandatory and government-licensed. CSQ certification is voluntary: an independent, third-party audit that adds evidence on top of those rules. A CSQ certificate is not TGA GMP evidence. Only TGA can license an Australian manufacturer, and for overseas sites TGO 93 accepts only GMP evidence issued by a government authority.
NEW FROM CSQ
The CSQ Pharma-GMP Addendum, Explained
WHAT IT COVERS
Medicinal cannabinoid materials and products
Starting materials, APIs, intermediates and finished products across cultivation, extraction and manufacturing, including inhalable, solid and liquid ingestible, dermal and mucosal dosage forms. It sits on top of a CSQ Level 3 certification.
WHAT IT’S BUILT ON
EU GMP and US 21 CFR 210/211
EudraLex Volume 4 Parts I and II and 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211, plus ICH, Ph. Eur., USP, cGACP and other recognised standards for herbal and botanical medicines.
WHAT IT IS NOT
A private audit, not a regulatory approval
In Australia, a CSQ certificate with the Addendum is not a TGA manufacturing licence, not GMP evidence under TGO 93, not an ODC licence or permit, not an ARTG entry, and not an SAS or Authorised Prescriber approval.
What the Addendum adds
CSQ describes the Pharma-GMP Addendum as “a scope expansion for CSQ Certified, Level 3, licensed operations cultivating, processing, producing, handling, storing, distributing, and/or selling cannabinoid herbal materials, substances, and/or products as medicinal cannabinoid products.” It can be added to any Level 3 CSQ certification, and its audit requirements apply on top of the applicable CSQ standard.
The Addendum incorporates US 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211 and EU GMP (EudraLex Volume 4, Parts I and II, with their annexes and guidance), along with ASTM, ICH, ISO, cGACP, cGMP, cGDP, HACCP, HARPC, AHPA, USP and Ph. Eur. standards and best practices for botanical drug and herbal medicinal products. It covers starting materials, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), and intermediate and finished medicinal cannabinoid products. Two rules stand out:
- Where GACP ends and GMP begins. Only the initial post-harvest steps that a product’s authorisation explicitly allows, such as cutting, may follow good agricultural and collection practices (cGACP). Drying, curing and every later step must follow cGMP, and the site must document exactly where the switch happens.
- Pharmacopoeial-grade inputs. Excipients and other non-active ingredients must meet USP, Ph. Eur. or another recognised monograph (or a justified specification where none exists), with concentrations defined in product specifications and master manufacturing records.
How CSQ classifies medicinal cannabinoid products
| CSQ classification | EU classification | US classification |
|---|---|---|
| Medicinal cannabinoid herbal material products | Herbal substances | Botanical raw materials |
| Medicinal cannabinoid substance products | Herbal preparations | Botanical drug substances |
| Medicinal cannabinoid products | Herbal medicinal products | Botanical drug products |
In Australia, TGO 93 treats all of these as medicinal cannabis products or their ingredients: therapeutic goods that contain, or are manufactured from, any part of the cannabis plant.
How it relates to Australian rules
Australian manufacturing licences apply the PIC/S Guide to GMP (PE 009-17). For steps carried out overseas, TGO 93 lists the GMP codes it accepts, including the PIC/S Guide, the EU GMP rules and US 21 CFR Part 211 (s 13(2)), and the Addendum is built on two of those. A listed code is not accepted evidence, though: TGO 93 still requires a GMP certificate from a listed government authority, or written confirmation from TGA (s 13(3)). [CONFIRM: whether CSQ will map the Addendum to PIC/S PE 009-17 and TGO 93 for Australian sites]
CSQ’s disclaimer: “The CSQ Pharma-GMP Addendum is a private third-party conformity assessment and is NOT the same as an EU Competent Authority GMP certificate, Manufacturing/Import Authorization (MIA), Marketing Authorization (MA), EudraGMDP entry, or Qualified Person (QP) batch certification/release; nor is it the same as an US FDA/DEA authorization/registration or New Drug Application (NDA); or any other market/regulatory authorization/registration or special-access permission granted by an Authority Having Jurisdiction/Competent Authority.”
FIND YOUR PATH
Match Your Australian Operation to the Right CSQ Scope
ODC-Licensed Grower or Producer
Narcotic Drugs Act s 8E · ODC licence + permitSTANDARD
CSQ Cultivation v2.0.0 (+ CSQ Extraction v2.0.0 for a first crude extract)
MINIMUM LEVEL
Level 3 + Pharma-GMP Addendum
PREP TIME
Varies by scope
AUDIT LENGTH
Level 3: min. 2 days onsite + 1 day offsite doc evaluation (initial), plus Addendum time [CONFIRM]
Grows, harvests, cuts and dries cannabis, or makes a first crude extract, for a TGA-licensed manufacturer. These steps are exempt from TGA licensing (Therapeutic Goods Regulations Sch 7 item 2), but TGA expects GMP principles, and the plant must still meet TGO 93’s contaminant limits. This is where CSQ adds the most: an independent audit of growing and post-harvest controls that no TGA licence covers, and evidence your manufacturer and sponsor customers can rely on. Under the Addendum, drying and curing must follow cGMP.
TGA-Licensed Manufacturer
Therapeutic Goods Act Part 3-3 · PIC/S PE 009-17 · ODCSTANDARD
CSQ Extraction / Manufacturing v2.0.0
MINIMUM LEVEL
Level 3 + Pharma-GMP Addendum
PREP TIME
Varies by scope
AUDIT LENGTH
Level 3: min. 2 days onsite + 1 day offsite doc evaluation (initial), plus Addendum time [CONFIRM]
Refines extracts, makes dosage forms, or packs, labels, stores, tests or releases medicinal cannabis products. Needs a TGA manufacturing licence (GMP to the PIC/S Guide PE 009-17) and an ODC licence and permit authorising manufacture; one does not replace the other. CSQ does not duplicate TGA licensing. It adds CSQ’s cannabis-specific requirements, such as process-gas and ethanol purity, inhalation-grade ingredients, cannabinoid waste separation and an annual mock recall, with unannounced audits at Level 3: useful for supplier programs, partners and export customers.
Sponsor or Importer
TGO 93 s 13 · Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regs reg 5 · ODCSTANDARD
Supplier assurance; CSQ Warehousing & Distribution v1.0.0 for storage sites
MINIMUM LEVEL
Varies
PREP TIME
Varies by scope
AUDIT LENGTH
Per scope
The sponsor is legally responsible for TGO 93 compliance and must hold government-issued GMP evidence for every site in the supply chain. An importer also needs an ODC import licence and a permit for each shipment. CSQ certificates on your growers and manufacturers add independent, annual verification to supplier qualification, but they are not the GMP evidence TGO 93 requires. Storage is itself a manufacturing step in Australia, so storage sites need a TGA licence too.
Overseas Manufacturer Supplying Australia
TGO 93 s 13(2)–(3)STANDARD
CSQ Extraction / Manufacturing v2.0.0
MINIMUM LEVEL
Level 3 + Pharma-GMP Addendum
PREP TIME
Varies by scope
AUDIT LENGTH
Level 3: min. 2 days onsite + 1 day offsite doc evaluation (initial), plus Addendum time [CONFIRM]
Every manufacturing step outside Australia must follow a GMP code that TGO 93 lists, and the site must hold government-issued evidence. Evidence from authorities in the UK, the EU, Canada, South Africa, Israel and New Zealand is accepted; a site in any other country, including the USA, needs written confirmation from TGA, which means a TGA inspection paid for by the sponsor. CSQ cannot stand in for that evidence. It can give an Australian sponsor an independent, cannabis-specific audit of a supplier site.
Testing Laboratory
Therapeutic Goods Act s 3 · ISO/IEC 17025STANDARD
ISO/IEC 17025
MINIMUM LEVEL
N/A
PREP TIME
Varies
AUDIT LENGTH
Per TGA licence
In Australia, testing and release for supply are manufacturing steps, so a laboratory testing medicinal cannabis for release needs a TGA licence. CSQ does not certify laboratories; it requires certified operations to use ISO/IEC 17025-accredited labs for compliance testing. That is lab-competence accreditation, not the ISO/IEC 17065 accreditation held by product-certification bodies.
AUSTRALIA REQUIRES VS. CSQ GOES FURTHER
What’s an Australian Rule, and What’s a CSQ Best Practice?
What Australia requires (the legal floor)
- An ODC medicinal cannabis licence plus permits before any cultivation, production or manufacture, with fit-and-proper and physical-security tests — Narcotic Drugs Act 1967 ss 8E, 8G
- A TGA manufacturing licence for every manufacturing step (processing, packaging, labelling, storage, testing, release for supply), with GMP to the PIC/S Guide PE 009-17 via the Manufacturing Principles — Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 ss 3, 35
- An ODC licence and a TGA licence are separate; one does not replace the other
- Exemption from TGA licensing for growing, cutting, drying and first crude extraction when the material goes to a licensed manufacturer; GMP principles still expected — TG Regulations 1990 Sch 7 item 2; TGO 93 s 13(1)
- The TGO 93 product standard: identity testing, contaminant limits (aflatoxins, heavy metals, pesticides, ochratoxin A), assay limits, microbial limits, labelling and child-resistant packaging — TGO 93 ss 7–16 (ss 13–16 apply to product released for supply from 1 July 2023)
- Government-issued GMP evidence for every overseas manufacturing step, held by the sponsor — TGO 93 s 13(2)–(4)
- Release for supply by an Authorised Person at a TGA-licensed site, or at an overseas site with TGO 93 evidence
- An ODC import licence and a permit for each shipment — Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956 reg 5
- Supply of unapproved products only through the Special Access Scheme, the Authorised Prescriber scheme or a clinical trial; no wholesale supply, and no advertising to consumers
- No private GMP certificate is required, and none is named
What CSQ adds (voluntary best practice)
- An independent certificate from a CSQ-licensed, ISO/IEC 17065-accredited certification body, renewed every year, with unannounced audits at Level 3
- An independent audit of the upstream steps Australian law exempts from TGA licensing: growing, harvest, cutting, drying and first crude extraction
- Under the Pharma-GMP Addendum, drying, curing and every later post-harvest step under cGMP, with a documented hand-over point from cGACP to cGMP
- A documented system for staying compliant with your ODC licence and permits and with TGO 93 (Section 1.3, Regulatory Compliance): CSQ audits that system; it does not certify TGO 93 compliance
- A documented internal audit program (Section 1.5) and CAPA system (Section 1.6)
- An annual mock recall (Section 1.8) and a verified traceability test
- Cannabinoid and non-cannabinoid waste streams kept completely separated (Section 2A.4 / 2B.4)
- Process gases, including CO₂, at ≥99.5% purity, with CO₂ beverage-grade or better; inhalation-grade ingredients for inhalable products
- Excipients to USP, Ph. Eur. or another recognised monograph (Pharma-GMP Addendum)
- Supplier assurance for manufacturers and sponsors, investor and partner diligence, and confidence for export buyers
- What CSQ does not replace: TGA and ODC licences and permits, TGO 93 GMP evidence, TGA inspections, release by an Authorised Person, TGO 93 batch testing and certificates of analysis, ARTG registration, SAS or Authorised Prescriber approvals, and state or territory prescribing approvals
Quick glossary — the terms that show up in an Australian CSQ audit
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
Office of Drug Control (ODC)
Medicinal cannabis licence
TGA manufacturing licence
PIC/S Guide to GMP (PE 009-17)
TGO 93
GACP and GMP
Sponsor
SAS, Authorised Prescriber and ARTG
ISO/IEC 17065
ISO/IEC 17025
What a CSQ Audit Actually Looks Like
Scoring (100-point scale)
How CSQ scores you and what it means for your certificate
| Score | Outcome | Surveillance Cycle |
|---|---|---|
| 80–100 | Certificate issued | Annual recertification audit |
| 70–79 | Certificate issued | 6-month surveillance audit |
| Below 70 | No certificate | 6-month wait before re-audit |
Findings categories
Auto-fail finding
A requirement has not been implemented and is a significant risk to product safety and quality. Scored –100 (automatic failure): a single Critical finding fails the audit, no matter the other scores.
Significant gap
A gap against a CSQ requirement that, if not addressed, will likely lead to a risk to product safety and quality. Requires an approved corrective action within 30 calendar days.
Isolated finding
A gap against a CSQ requirement that, if not addressed, may lead to a risk to product safety or quality — often an isolated documentation or recordkeeping lapse. Still requires an approved corrective action within 30 calendar days.
Audit timing & certificate validity
What to expect onsite and on the calendar
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Level 1 audit | Minimum 1 day onsite + 0.5 day report time |
| Level 2 audit | Minimum 1.5 days onsite + 1 day report time |
| Level 3 audit (required for the Addendum) | Minimum 2 days onsite + 1 day report time; the initial onsite audit is unannounced, 30–60 days after the documentation evaluation |
| Pharma-GMP Addendum | [CONFIRM: extra audit time for the Pharma-GMP Addendum] |
| Initial audit add-on | +1 day for offsite documentation evaluation (all levels) |
| Corrective action window | 30 days to close nonconformities |
| Certificate validity | 1 year + 45 days from audit date |
| Unannounced audit | At least one every 3 years at every level, and at every Level 3 recertification |
| Provisional certificate | Only where licensing requires an audit before a new operation starts and no records exist yet (valid 6 months; a follow-up audit then issues the full certificate) |
Australian medicinal cannabis rules and corresponding CSQ 2.0 sections
| Requirement | Citation | CSQ Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| ODC medicinal cannabis licence and permits | Narcotic Drugs Act 1967 ss 8E, 8G | Module 1 (CSQMS) + Section 1.3 (Regulatory Compliance) |
| TGA manufacturing licence; GMP to the PIC/S Guide | Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 ss 3, 35; Manufacturing Principles (PIC/S PE 009-17) | Section 2A.12 (Production and Process Controls) + Pharma-GMP Addendum (EudraLex Vol. 4 Parts I–II; 21 CFR 210/211). CSQ does not replace the licence |
| GMP principles for exempt growing, cutting, drying and first crude extraction | TG Regulations 1990 Sch 7 item 2; TGO 93 s 13(1); TGA guidance | CSQ Cultivation v2.0.0 (cGACP) + Section 2A.12.1 (Standard Operating Procedures); Pharma-GMP Addendum Note 1 (drying and curing under cGMP) |
| Identity, contaminant, assay and microbial limits | TGO 93 ss 10, 12, 16; Schedule 1 | Section 2A.12.9 (Product Sampling and Testing). CSQ requires ISO/IEC 17025 labs |
| Labelling and child-resistant packaging | TGO 93 ss 14–15 | Section 2A.12.8 (Product Labeling and Packaging). CSQ verifies labels against the applicable rules |
| Release for supply by an Authorised Person | Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 s 3 (release for supply is manufacture) | Section 2A.10.2 / 2A.10.4 (Acceptance and Release; Hold and Release). Release itself stays a TGA-licensed step |
| GMP evidence for overseas sites, held by the sponsor | TGO 93 s 13(2)–(4) | Section 1.4 (Documentation and Recordkeeping). A CSQ certificate is not TGO 93 GMP evidence |
| Import licence and per-shipment permit; traceability records | Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956 reg 5 | Section 2A.10.1 (Identification and Traceability) + Section 1.4 (Documentation and Recordkeeping) |
How to Prepare | A Realistic Path to CSQ Certification
Why Work With Kiwa ASI on CSQ in Australia
CSQ-licensed, ISO/IEC 17065-accredited
Today CSQ lists one licensed certification body: Kiwa ASI (ASI Food Safety, LLC), accredited by ANAB to ISO/IEC 17065. [CONFIRM: certificate issuer for Australian sites]
100+ certified U.S. sites
CSQ’s public directory lists more than 100 certified sites across 16 U.S. states (October 2026).
Direct scheduling, clear scope
Pre-audit scoping clarifies level, scope and Addendum requirements before anyone is onsite. Audit reports are turned around inside the standard CSQ timeline.
Surveillance and recertification
We manage the full CSQ cycle: annual recertification before your certificate expires, plus the 6-month surveillance audit required after a 70–79 score.
Disclosed and documented
CSQ is owned by ASI Global Standards, LLC. CSQ discloses that its parent company, ASI Holdings, also owns ASI Food Safety, LLC, Kiwa ASI’s certification body, and it publishes an impartiality statement about that relationship.
Kiwa in Australia
Audits for Australian operations are coordinated with Kiwa’s Australian team, Compass Assurance Services, Kiwa’s certification office in Queensland. [CONFIRM: auditor and booking model for Australia]
Frequently Asked Questions About Medicinal Cannabis GMP in Australia & CSQ Certification
Yes, for manufacturing. Carrying out a step in manufacturing therapeutic goods, including processing, packaging, labelling, storage, testing and release for supply, requires a TGA manufacturing licence unless an exemption applies (Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 ss 3, 35). Every licence requires compliance with the Manufacturing Principles, which adopt the PIC/S Guide to GMP (PE 009-17), and products must meet TGO 93. Australia does not require a private GMP certificate.
Two federal regulators. The Office of Drug Control administers the Narcotic Drugs Act 1967 and licenses cultivation, production, manufacture, import and export. The TGA regulates quality under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989: manufacturing licences, GMP, the TGO 93 product standard and the access schemes. A licence from one does not replace a licence from the other. States and territories give medicines scheduling legal effect and, depending on the product, may require their own prescribing approval.
Not always. Plant material and crude oils used only as starting materials by a licensed manufacturer are exempt (Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 Schedule 7 item 2). TGA says this lets cultivation sites grow, cut and dry plant material, or perform the first crude extraction, without a GMP approval when the material goes on to a GMP-licensed site. The exemption does not cover steps such as packing finished product, refining beyond the first crude extract, decontamination, testing for release or release for supply. Growers still need an ODC licence and permits, and TGA expects GMP principles throughout.
No. Only TGA can license an Australian manufacturer. For steps carried out overseas, TGO 93 accepts only GMP certificates issued by listed government authorities, or written confirmation from TGA (s 13(3)). A CSQ certificate, like any private certificate, is not that evidence, is not TGA approval, and does not replace an ODC licence or permit.
A scope expansion CSQ is launching for Level 3 certified operations that handle cannabis as medicinal cannabinoid products. It incorporates US 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211 and EU GMP (EudraLex Volume 4, Parts I and II), with ICH, Ph. Eur., USP, cGACP and other recognised standards, and it covers starting materials, APIs, intermediates and finished products. CSQ describes it as a private third-party conformity assessment, not a regulatory GMP certificate or authorisation.
Australian manufacturing licences apply the PIC/S Guide to GMP (PE 009-17). For steps carried out overseas, TGO 93 lists the GMP codes it accepts, including the PIC/S Guide, the EU GMP rules and US 21 CFR Part 211; the Addendum is built on EU GMP and 21 CFR 210/211. That shared foundation does not make a CSQ certificate acceptable GMP evidence under TGO 93, which requires evidence from a government authority or TGA.
An ODC-licensed grower or producer uses CSQ Cultivation v2.0.0 (with CSQ Extraction v2.0.0 for a first crude extract); a manufacturer uses CSQ Extraction or Manufacturing v2.0.0; storage and distribution sites fit CSQ Warehousing & Distribution v1.0.0. To add the Pharma-GMP Addendum, the certification must be at Level 3. Testing laboratories follow ISO/IEC 17025; CSQ does not certify labs. Kiwa ASI can combine scopes into one coordinated audit.
Level 3 covers CSQ Modules 1–5. After an offsite documentation evaluation, the initial onsite audit is unannounced, 30–60 days later, with a minimum of 2 days onsite. Audits are scored out of 100: 80–100 earns a certificate with annual recertification, 70–79 earns a certificate plus a 6-month surveillance audit, and below 70 means no certificate. A single Critical finding fails the audit. Certificates are valid for 1 year plus 45 days.
CSQ is a private, voluntary certification program for cannabis and hemp operations. Audits are carried out and certificates issued by certification bodies that CSQ licenses and that must be accredited to ISO/IEC 17065. Today CSQ lists one licensed certification body: Kiwa ASI (ASI Food Safety, LLC), accredited by ANAB to ISO/IEC 17065. Audits for Australian operations are coordinated with Kiwa’s Australian team, Compass Assurance Services, Kiwa’s certification office in Queensland.
CSQ is owned by ASI Global Standards, LLC. CSQ discloses that its parent company, ASI Holdings, also owns ASI Food Safety, LLC, Kiwa ASI’s certification body, and it publishes an impartiality statement about that relationship.
CSQ certifies cannabis and hemp operations. In Australia, industrial hemp (no more than 1% THC) is licensed for non-medicinal uses such as fibre and seed by state agencies, for example Biosecurity Queensland, Agriculture Victoria and PIRSA in South Australia. Growing or making cannabis for medicinal purposes, including low-THC material, needs ODC licences and permits.
Because Australia’s GMP licensing starts at manufacture, while the steps before it (growing, cutting, drying and first crude extraction) can run without a TGA licence. CSQ gives those upstream sites an independent, annual audit, and the Pharma-GMP Addendum puts drying and curing under cGMP. For manufacturers and sponsors, CSQ certificates on suppliers add independent verification to supplier qualification. TGO 93 has no pre-market check: TGA verifies compliance through random and targeted audits and testing. CSQ does not certify TGO 93 compliance, but its annual audits give buyers independent evidence of the quality system behind a product.